Re: Getting CreativeWork Relationships done

But work/edition is just one relationship.  What property(ies) would you
use to go between them?

The wikipedia page links to
http://www.worldcat.org/title/adventures-of-huckleberry-finn/oclc/29489461
The worldcat page links to
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/77694.The_Adventures_of_Huckleberry_Finn
The Goodreads page links to
http://www.goodreads.com/reader/478-adventures-of-huckleberry-finn?return_to=%2Fbook%2Fshow%2F77694.The_Adventures_of_Huckleberry_Finn(with
a note, "different edition")

The wikipedia article also links to all of these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventures_of_Huckleberry_Finn#External_links

The OpenLibrary page has previous and next links, leading to different
manifestations.

HathiTrust has a whole slew of links to other instantiations:
http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/012256253

How many more of these do you need?

-Ross.


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Ross Singer <ross.singer@talis.com>wrote:
>
>> How do you relate these together?  How do you say they're all expressions
>> of the same work?
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adventures_of_Huckleberry_Finn
>> http://lccn.loc.gov/35020965
>>
>> https://openlibrary.org/books/OL19412083M/Die_Abenteuer_des_Huckleberry_Finn
>> http://www.gutenberg.org/files/19640/19640-index.html
>>
>
> Wikipedia articles are almost always principally about the work.  Of
> course, in the Wikipedia tradition, they never feel constrained to cover
> just one things, so mix in a smattering of discussion about editions,
> adaptations, etc.
>
> The other three records refer to editions.  The fact that we don't know
> which edition served as the basis for the translation or which edition was
> performed for the audiobook (perhaps not a published one) doesn't make them
> any less editions of the work.
>
>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Ross Singer <ross.singer@talis.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> You're referring to a very different (and much more complicated and
>>>> human intensive) component of FRBR: adaptations, translations, supplements,
>>>> etc.  commonEndeavour is intended to smooth over different versions of the
>>>> _same_ work (that is, the various printed forms of 'Adventures of
>>>> Huckleberry Finn', but it wouldn't generally be used to link to a stage or
>>>> screen adaptation, for example) as opposed to related works.  We have a lot
>>>> of data that we know is referring to the same general intellectual output,
>>>> but we do not necessarily know the direct relationship between the
>>>> individual representations of it, nor do most people care (they just care
>>>> about the work, in general).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you provide a link to a web page (Wikipedia article, book review,
>>> etc) which expresses a relationship like this in English?  I don't think
>>> I've ever run across it and I'm having a hard time envisioning when it
>>> would occur.
>>>
>>
> Now, will you consider answering my question?
>
> Tom
>