Strategy for marking sections as "draft / abandoned / recommended by schemabibex / published at schema.org"?

• From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:27:11 -0500
• To: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CAAY5AM1ExUL-CrmvZdUdAF06+OzYhd=L45pF5uXzz15T3QbgdA@mail.gmail.com>

Hello:

Per Diane Hillman's blog post at
http://managemetadata.com/blog/2014/02/03/talking-points-report/ do we
want to standardize how we're publishing our work on the wiki? Just as
Diane was led down the wrong path initially with multipe pages around
holdings, I could envision other similar confusion in the future over
our historical article/periodical pages, etc.

I propose that we clearly mark at the top of each page the status of
the page; something like:

Status (<date>): <status>

Where <status> could be one of:

* "Draft"
* "Abandoned"
* "Recommended by Schema BibEx (best practice)"
* "Recommended by Schema BibEx (schema.org extension)"
* "Published schema.org extension"

Perhaps with some mediawiki-savvy way of tagging the page, as well, so
that we can survey the pages. (I'm not all that familiar with
mediawiki, so suggestions welcome!)

Thanks,
Dan

Received on Monday, 3 February 2014 18:27:40 UTC