- From: Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:50:39 +0000
- To: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
- CC: Adrian Pohl <pohl@hbz-nrw.de>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
+1 >From discussions at DCMI2013 Dan Brickley knows it is coming. ~Richard On 9 Sep 2013, at 11:21, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, if there are no other comments or objections by the end of > today, I'll post this proposal to the public-vocabs list. Thanks to > everyone who took the time to poke at it so far! > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sounds great, Adrian! I've incorporated it into the wiki page. >> >> Thanks for the suggestion! >> >> Dan >> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Adrian Pohl <pohl@hbz-nrw.de> wrote: >>> +1. >>> >>> I really like this proposal too. The proposed adjustment will be very useful for others as well. I noticed one minor thing that might improve the proposal a bit. As I don't see services like Netflix included in the examples, I'd add an example for just licensing the ability to stream music, a movie or TV show or even to read an eBook you have from the Kindle store (which might be removed from your device without asking...). An according addition might look something like: >>> >>> "Proposed: An offer to transfer some rights to an item or to provide a service--for example, an offer to sell tickets to an event, to rent the DVD of a movie, to stream a TV show over the internet, to repair a motorcycle, or to loan a book. " >>> >>> All the best >>> Adrian >>> >>>>>> On 29.8.2013 at 19:33, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hello: >>>> >>>> As I agreed to do during the August conference call, I have created >>>> http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Broaden_Offer_usage with >>>> my first draft of the set of proposed modifications to >>>> http://schema.org/Offer and its associated types and properties to >>>> better support non-commercial offers (including the hoary old example >>>> of loaning books from a library). >>>> >>>> While support for the general idea has already been expressed by >>>> others on the public-vocabs list[1], the idea is that we first review >>>> this proposal within the schema-bibex group, and then bring it forward >>>> to public-vocabs for further discussion. >>>> >>>> So... feedback / questions / contributions welcome! >>>> >>>> 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Aug/0013.html >>> >>> >>> > >
Received on Monday, 9 September 2013 21:51:11 UTC