Re: Holdings

Thanks, Richard. Personally, I would switch inventoryIdentifier and 
serialNumber -- the barcode on the book is the inventory identifier. 
Serial number works just as well for either, so it could be the call number.

Other than that, I think this is good to go, but we never got a 
definitive answer about de-commercializing the definitions, did we? 
However, we also got only positive responses, as I recall.

kc

On 10/15/13 7:28 AM, Wallis,Richard wrote:
> Following an action from the September meeting, I have updated the
> Holdings proposal
> <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Holdings_via_Offer> and
> put it out on this list for discussion.
>
> Background:  This proposal is based upon using the Schema Offer
> <http://schema.org/Offer> type to describe holdings information.  Only
> needing the addition of an 'inventoryIdentifier' property.  The proposal
> also builds upon the proposal to de-commercialise the Offer type
> <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Broaden_Offer_usage> (removing
> specific references to selling) put forward by Dan Scott.
>
>
> Comments requested ahead of agreement on this, and the proposing of of
> the new property - possibly by including it in the de-commercialising
> proposal.
>
>
> ~Richard
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 17:14:55 UTC