On 29 Nov 2013, at 15:12, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your interest in this discussion! I have edited the description of the proposed Periodical "issn" property at http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Periodical#Thing_.3E_CreativeWork_.3E_Collection_.3E_Periodical to reflect the repeatability of the property if one wishes to reflect different editions, with an example of format as the most likely reason for adding multiple "issn" properties.. Sounds good to me > > If the ISSN-L is currently rarely displayed, then perhaps we should simply be silent about it in the current Periodical proposal rather than minting a separate "issn-l" property at this time. That said, I don't think there would be significant harm caused if someone did end up using the "issn" property to identify an ISSN-L, given that it would be likely to be one of several "issn" properties in that case. Not just 'likely' - but should always be one of the existing ISSN properties. Sounds reasonable to not worry about having a property for it at the moment Owen Owen Stephens Owen Stephens Consulting Web: http://www.ostephens.com Email: owen@ostephens.com Telephone: 0121 288 6936
Received on Friday, 29 November 2013 16:57:17 UTC