- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:10:16 +0100
- To: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Hi Richard, OK, good to know you're tracking this--and thanks. So we'll need more discussion in the coming weeks then? Btw thanks for the link http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Schema_CreativeWork_Relationships I didn't remember where this page was--it's not accessible from http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Vocabulary_Proposals Antoine > Hi Antoine, > > When we propose these changes they should be in relation to the list of potential CreativeWork relationship properties <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Schema_CreativeWork_Relationships>, previously discussed on public-vocabs (which would need updating). Noting previous comments about discussing the core property names, worrying about directionally separately. > > I would update my email to reflect this, and to fix the spelling mistakes. > > > ~Richard > > On 27 Nov 2013, at 16:20, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote: > >> Hi Richard, all, >> >> I'm sorry I've missed so many discussions lately... >> >> But before sending this to public-vocabs I'd have one extra question. Has the relationship between these 'adaptations' and our work relations been discussed too? >> Looking at >> http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/CreativeWork_Relationships >> http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/CommonEndeavor >> >> In other words, *and ignoring the direction of the properties for now* (makes the discussion easier!): are either of accessAdaptation or contentAdaptation specializations of commonEndeavour or workExample? >> >> Antoine >> >> >> >>> Following our discussions in the last meeting, I include below a draft email to the public-vocabs list for comment before I send it to that list. >>> >>> ~Richard >>> >>> One of the issues dropped from the accepted Accessibility proposal, for further discussion <http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Accessibility/ToDo>, was the definition of the properties hasAdaptation & isAdaptionOf. They were noted as to be handled by the SchemaBibEx <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/> group. >>> >>> The main concern was the potential ambiguity that would arise from the simple use of the term ‘Adaption’. In the Accessibility domain it inferred that the format/representation of the content has been adapted for accessibility reasons. In the bibliographic/creative works domain, an adaption is one where the content has been changed/interpreted in a different way. There is also potential for format-adaptions of a content-adaption of an original creative work. >>> >>> The schemabibEx group discussed this in our recent meeting and came up with the following proposals: >>> >>> * accessAdaption - URL - Identifier of a resource that is an adaptation, for accessibility purposes, for this resource. >>> * accessAdaptionOf - URL - Identifier of a resource for which this is an adaptation for accessibility purposes. >>> * contentAdaption - CreativeWork - An adaptation of the content of this work. >>> * contentAdaptionOf - CreativeWork - A work that the content of this work is adapted from. >>> >>> >>> ~Richard >>> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 16:10:49 UTC