Re: Why we want to have separate Periodical and (Periodical)Issu(e|ance) types from Dan Scott on 2013-11-25 (public-schemabibex@w3.org from November 2013)

From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:36:07 -0500
To: Shlomo Sanders <Shlomo.Sanders@exlibrisgroup.com>
Cc: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "Niklas Lindstr?m" <lindstream@gmail.com>, Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAY5AM34yFSZmvKWm3eMG_FZ5C2pgM6bkH9B+qTMi6BvxZ=qfQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Shlomo Sanders
<Shlomo.Sanders@exlibrisgroup.com> wrote:
> "Someone else (sorry, I forget who) mentioned that structured data is meant for consumption by machines, not humans, which seemed to be part of your concern about this separation of Periodical and Issue"
>
> That was me and I meant it just the opposite. Because it is meant for machine consumption we can separate into Periodical and Issue!

Thanks for clearing up that mystery for me, Shlomo! I understood what
you meant during the call, I just did a very poor / confusing job of
paraphrasing it :)

Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 14:36:34 UTC