- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:04:00 -0400
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
At the risk of distracting people from my favorite, I would re-offer: oneOf without an inverse property. There are plenty of properties in Schema.org that don't have an inverse, so this shouldn't be unusual to them. Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Wallis,Richard [mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org] > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:58 PM > To: public-schemabibex@w3.org > Subject: Candidates for the CreativeWork property names vote off > > Following Antoine's suggestion and little consensus as to the names for > the CreativeWork properties currently documented as hasInstance & > isInstanceOf - I am preparing to have a vote on it. > > So this is the first part of the process - assembling the candidates. > > Here is a few of what I remember having seen and heard in threads and > discussions - please add others I have missed or that you think of over > the next few days. I will close the candidate list on 31st March. > > > 1. hasInstance/instanceOf > 2. hasConcretization/concretizationOf > 3. hasRealization/relaisationOf > 4. hasExpression/expressionOf > 5. hasExample/exampleOf > 6. hasDerivative/derivativeOf > > ~Richard > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 20:05:10 UTC