Re: Which properties to expose Was: Extension syntax Was: Re: Updated Example

Yes. 

~Richard


On 25 Feb 2013, at 22:27, "Owen Stephens" <owen@ostephens.com> wrote:

> Is this what we are doing though? In terms of schema.org the question I think we need to consider is not 'how to map MARC' but 'how to improve the html markup to include structured data'.
> 
> I'd agree that this sets the bar rather low. But I thought that was the point?
> 
> Owen
> 
> Owen Stephens
> Owen Stephens Consulting
> Web: http://www.ostephens.com
> Email: owen@ostephens.com
> Telephone: 0121 288 6936
> 
> On 25 Feb 2013, at 17:46, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org> wrote:
> 
>> Mapping from a detailed data format, such as Marc or ONIX, to a generic
>> vocabulary such as Schema is by definition lossy.  As a community we need to
>> accept that, whilst giving good justification (by our proposals) as to why
>> it is [currently] too lossy.
>