- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@oclc.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:01:59 +0000
- To: "Heuvelmann, Reinhold" <R.Heuvelmann@dnb.de>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
+1 On 13/02/2013 14:38, "Heuvelmann, Reinhold" <R.Heuvelmann@dnb.de> wrote: > In the whole business of resource categorization, I sometimes lean toward a > flat solution. So instead of building up hierarchies of broad distinctions, > with narrower subtypes, and even narrower sub-subtypes, etc. -- why not have > single types, with definitions as clear as possible, but without too many > implications or restrictions (which a different user or community would > resist)? > > And using these flat types is just assigning and adding whatever fits, without > having to think too much about parents, children, siblings, or overlaps etc. > > My 2 ct. > > Reinhold
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 15:03:30 UTC