- From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:52:06 -0400
- To: Adrian Pohl <pohl@hbz-nrw.de>
- Cc: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Sounds great, Adrian! I've incorporated it into the wiki page. Thanks for the suggestion! Dan On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Adrian Pohl <pohl@hbz-nrw.de> wrote: > +1. > > I really like this proposal too. The proposed adjustment will be very useful for others as well. I noticed one minor thing that might improve the proposal a bit. As I don't see services like Netflix included in the examples, I'd add an example for just licensing the ability to stream music, a movie or TV show or even to read an eBook you have from the Kindle store (which might be removed from your device without asking...). An according addition might look something like: > > "Proposed: An offer to transfer some rights to an item or to provide a service--for example, an offer to sell tickets to an event, to rent the DVD of a movie, to stream a TV show over the internet, to repair a motorcycle, or to loan a book. " > > All the best > Adrian > >>>> On 29.8.2013 at 19:33, Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello: >> >> As I agreed to do during the August conference call, I have created >> http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Broaden_Offer_usage with >> my first draft of the set of proposed modifications to >> http://schema.org/Offer and its associated types and properties to >> better support non-commercial offers (including the hoary old example >> of loaning books from a library). >> >> While support for the general idea has already been expressed by >> others on the public-vocabs list[1], the idea is that we first review >> this proposal within the schema-bibex group, and then bring it forward >> to public-vocabs for further discussion. >> >> So... feedback / questions / contributions welcome! >> >> 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Aug/0013.html > > >
Received on Friday, 30 August 2013 14:52:37 UTC