- From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 13:12:27 -0400
- To: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Bah, burned by my "reply" defaults. Thanks to Karen for pointing this out... I was wondering why Thad was the only person who had made any changes! See below for a Google Doc with a draft recommendation for using Offer to mark up holdings, editable by all. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:44 PM Subject: Re: Changes vs. new element To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > My Suggestion. > > Throw your work in progress of Schema examples onto an Etherpad, so that > everyone can see, comment, etc. PiratePad was crashing for me, so I went with https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fZ0iBQx0fQC3FPybJ_jZOy4M0HhSmnnjqOO0OjRqpfg/edit?usp=sharing as a "recommendations" document for mapping holdings to http://schema.org/Offer. I put a special focus on libraries, as the path to the appropriate schema.org/Offer attributes is much less clear than it would be for, say, book sellers. The doc is open for the world to edit, so we'll see if it works out. I've posted a copy of that content as of now at http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Holdings_via_Offer in case it doesn't :)
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 17:12:55 UTC