- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:06:23 -0800
- To: public-schemabibex@w3.org
Good thinking, Kevin. Thanks. kc On 11/14/12 9:48 AM, Kevin Ford wrote: > I vote to just "do it." > > I think that if multiple communities request the same or similar > extensions (issueNumber, numberOfPages, etc) it enforces the notion that > these additions a more broadly desirable than if they just come from one > community. > > Yours, > > Kevin > > > > > On 11/07/2012 12:19 PM, Karen Coyle wrote: >> This is great. Do we have a way to collaborate with them on this? Or do >> we just "do it"? >> >> kc >> >> On 11/7/12 7:56 AM, Owen Stephens wrote: >>> Some stuff under the Comics and Periodical schema proposal may be >>> relevant? >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/PeriodicalsComics >>> >>> Owen >>> >>> Owen Stephens >>> Owen Stephens Consulting >>> Web: http://www.ostephens.com >>> Email: owen@ostephens.com >>> Telephone: 0121 288 6936 >>> >>> On 7 Nov 2012, at 15:39, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> Going beyond library catalog data (which is what I believe first >>>> motivated the creation of this group?) to a more general concept of >>>> bibliographic data and appropriate copy means that schema.org will >>>> need those key elements that are used to identify journal articles: >>>> >>>> ISSN >>>> journal title >>>> volume >>>> number >>>> first page >>>> (others?) >>>> >>>> I must admit that I am rather puzzled by the fact that >>>> http://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle doesn't have these (nor does >>>> MedicalArticle) -- to me they seem so obvious. Should we add this use >>>> case? >>>> >>>> kc >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Karen Coyle >>>> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net >>>> ph: 1-510-540-7596 >>>> m: 1-510-435-8234 >>>> skype: kcoylenet >>>> >>> >>> >> > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 20:06:47 UTC