- From: Philip Schreur <pschreur@stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:02:05 -0800
- To: "Dawson, Laura" <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>, public-schemabibex@w3.org
- Message-ID: <509A85FD.1060908@stanford.edu>
Karen et al., I've been speaking with HighWire Press about this issue and here was their list of desirables (some of which repeats what's already been said): article Abstract - The abstract or summary of the article volume - the print volume that this article was published in issue - The print issue that this article was published in pages - The printed page range for this article locator - A description (often numeric) that locates this article within its publication doi - The digital object identifier (DOI) used to uniquely identify this object pmid - The PubMed Identifier (pmid) assigned to this article's PubMed record publication - The full name of the journal or publication this article was published in publicationAbbreviation - The PubMed or other scholarly abbreviation of the journal this article was published in issn - The International Standard Serial Number used to identify the print edition eissn - The International Standard Serial Number used to identify the electronic edition owner - The copyright holder for the article rights - The license status of the article cites - A reference that this article cites Phil On 11/7/12 7:46 AM, Dawson, Laura wrote: > And DOI.... > On Nov 7, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net > <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote: > >> All, >> >> Going beyond library catalog data (which is what I believe first >> motivated the creation of this group?) to a more general concept of >> bibliographic data and appropriate copy means that schema.org >> <http://schema.org> will need >> those key elements that are used to identify journal articles: >> >> ISSN >> journal title >> volume >> number >> first page >> (others?) >> >> I must admit that I am rather puzzled by the fact that >> http://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle doesn't have these (nor does >> MedicalArticle) -- to me they seem so obvious. Should we add this use >> case? >> >> kc >> >> >> >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net >> ph: 1-510-540-7596 >> m: 1-510-435-8234 >> skype: kcoylenet >> > > Laura Dawson > Product Manager, Identifiers > Bowker > 908-219-0082 > 917-770-6641 > laura.dawson@bowker.com <mailto:laura.dawson@bowker.com> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 16:03:16 UTC