- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:24:46 +0000
- To: dimopot@gmail.com
- Cc: public-schema-gen@w3.org, Hans Polak <info@polak.es>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok2LGFE8CabnZT9Fc0fTh2CyDCD88U3MYzZ2dPrmkX7Q1A@mail.gmail.com>
I didn't expressly add language translations, etc. But it's certainly part of the mix. FWIW, next plan I'm interested in is likely start with a collaborative spreadsheet to add links we're aware of with comments and columns. Then look to update wiki pages. This one needs to be translated to languages including English :) https://github.com/assemblee-virtuelle/wpldp On Wed., 15 Feb. 2017, 1:21 am Dmytro Potekhin, <dimopot@gmail.com> wrote: > > + > > In case Ukrainian / Russian language support will be needed - I'll be glad > to help. > > > D > > 2017-02-14 16:13 GMT+02:00 Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>: > > Hi all, > > I wanted to make another call for input to the proposed changes for the > group description. > > If you were happy with the description, simply reply +1/0/-1 would be > great. Also importantly, if any big objections need to be considered. > > The Google docs link is below. > > Here's what it looks like now; > > Schema Generator Community Group has been established to improve the > availability, discovery and innovation of RDFa, Microdata, JSON-LD and > other structured data related tooling. Schema generation tools pertaining > to this group aim to ensure output can be validated with W3C.org Schema > validator or similar tools. > > > The group will assist others with discovering existing tools, updating > online materials to find tools and supporting the development of new tools. > > > The goal of this group is to foster the development of the ‘web of data’ > through developer support, community engagement and advocacy. Schema gen CG > will also assist by incubatee support for works that includes but are not > limited to support for production of new RDF related tools. > > > _----------------_----------------------- > > > Tim.h. > > > On Tue., 14 Feb. 2017, 12:50 am Timothy Holborn, < > timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've had a read of the initial documentation about the inception of the > group and as discussed elsewhere, i think it's important to ensure we're > building the CG based on principles rather than a product. (which i'm sure > was the underlying intent). I've attached a google doc[2] (please feel > welcome to request edit access to it, but comments are fine also). I > haven't put alot of thought into it yet; however one of my considerations > is whether we should be sticking to RDF rather than simply XML (including > of course, rdf/xml). > > schema.org (and OGP http://ogp.me/ ) are amongst the many RDF Ontologies > that exist on the web, some of which can be found here: > http://lod-cloud.net/ > > One of the most important plugin i've been using recently is: > http://osds.openlinksw.com/ - which helps people see the 'web of data'. > > Herein; some important distinctions exist between "linked data" (or RDF) > which is part of the semantic web stack; and XML. I propose we focus on > schema tools for RDF[3] which includes a bunch of serialization formats[4]. > > One of the 'to do items' will be to update existing wiki pages that > currently has outdated references on them. I've found it quite difficult > to find useful tools and have certainly found this part of the frustration > when people in senior positions tell me that they were unaware the > 'semantic web' was relevent nowadays. I think if we're able to help with > accessibility and descriptions / discovery for tooling; we'll both be able > to improve opportunities and circumstances in a number of different ways. > > ie: pages to be updated; > - https://www.w3.org/wiki/SemanticWebTools > - https://www.w3.org/wiki/Ontology_editors (to a lesser degree). > > Really quickly; with respect to other tools, > > - http://linda.epu.ntua.gr/ which relates to https://github.com/LinDA > -tools > - http://protege.stanford.edu/ > - http://json-ld.org/playground/ > - https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool > Other examples include word press ones like: > https://wordpress.org/plugins/lh-tools/ & > https://wordpress.org/plugins/lh-rdf/ > > We likely need to make a list of tools, the language / purpose of the > tools, etc. > > MEETINGS > Do we want to have regular Tele Conf / IRC meetings? I have found in the > Web Payments / Credentials teams meetings have in-turn forced people to > keep a schedule. If interest exists, let us know and we'll see what we can > do. In many cases, services like Gitter can also offer an alternative that > may work better for people world-wide in different timezones. Implication > is that we'll need to think about a github location, which i think is very > doable. > > RE: HANS PROJECT > The group was instigated by Hans Polak[5] who was inspired by his own > project. IMHO, we should figure out how to publish ideas on different > levels to help forge the means for these sorts of projects to get > under-way. We may find other W3 opportunities as we do these tasks; and i > for one, > > (IN CONCLUSION) > I am pleased this group has been created. The amount of frustration and > time it takes, even with some rather incredible support from W3 experts in > past; to both find the tools, figure out the flaws, opportunities and > benefits of tools; and indeed, educate others about them. > > I hope in future, It'll become far easier as we're simply able to flick > links whilst encouraging more and more people, to get involved with the > linguistics of ontology, schemas and www service support & design. > > If we can get onto resolving the attached summary about the formation of > the CG, i'm happy to follow-up with the W3 contact and get the page > modified. > > Any questions, ever, please do not hesitate to get in touch with me > directly. > > > Timothy Holborn > skype: sailing_digital > > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/community/schema-gen/ > [2] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-ukwFmcdGs6SwfaMz2RrfFQvG6o2PD8NfFreDAbri-A/edit?usp=sharing > > [3] https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html > [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework > [5] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemaorg/2017Feb/ > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2017 14:25:29 UTC