- From: Stuart Sutton <sasutton@dublincore.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 04:49:56 -0700
- To: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-schema-course-extend@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAK74qRvp7D3CR49bm220=2vswxE-tOcafejaTfNMKenNSzUj9g@mail.gmail.com>
Phil, while not particularly fond of "educationalCredentialAwarded", I also don't really have a suggestion of anything better beyond the more generic "credentialAwarded"; so, looks good to me. Trivial matter: In your example coding with the value "HNC Accounting", consider expanding the "HNC" to "Higher National Certificate in Accounting" for those that might not otherwise get that this is a form of credential. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higher_National_Certificate)...push to be explicit coming from someone who has little confidence that most people can easily infer anything. Stuart On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> wrote: > > I have drafted a description and a couple of examples based on the > proposal below. > > See wiki > > https://www.w3.org/community/schema-course-extend/wiki/Identifying_the_qualification_offered > > and test course.schema site > http://course.schema-course-extend.appspot.com/Course > http://course.schema-course-extend.appspot.com/educationalCredentialAwarded > > Any further comments/amendments? > > Phil > > On 20/06/16 14:05, Phil Barker wrote: > >> OK. As property name I am going to suggest educationalCredentialAwarded >> because we might in the future want EducationalCredential as a class name. >> >> So, my proposal is that in order to meet the use case that people can >> search for courses that offers a qualification the searcher would like to >> acquire we create a new property >> >> educationalCredentialAwarded domain Course, range Text or Thing. >> Definition: a description of the qualification, award, certificate, >> diploma or other educational credential awarded as a consequence of >> successful completion of this course. >> >> When the educational credentials/verifiable claims community have sorted >> out how they want to describe their domain in schema.org then I hope we >> will have some more specific schema type(s) that we can point to, but for >> now this seems to me to be good enough to solve the use case. Solving the >> bigger issue seems beyond the scope of this community group. >> >> Phil >> >> > > -- > -- > Phil Barker @philbarker > LRMI, Cetis, ICBL http://people.pjjk.net/phil > Heriot-Watt University > > Ubuntu: http://xkcd.com/456/ > not so much an operating system as a learning opportunity. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 11:50:31 UTC