Re: Charter Review Request — Semantic Agent Communication Community Group

Thanks Daniel .

It would be helpful if you can contribute a CG note for stateful KR bridge .

I am working on the CG notes for AgentIDL, liaisons.

Daniel Ramos <daniel@echosystems.ai>於 2025年12月12日 週五，上午2:14寫道：

> Tyson,
>
> Thanks for tightening the scope and explicitly allowing SDK implementation
> pattern discussion. I’m supportive of the updated draft. A few quick,
> concrete suggestions:
>
>
>    - Liaisons/Alignment: Consider an explicit liaison note to WebAgents
>    (interoperability TF) and AIKR, since there’s overlap on interaction
>    semantics and stateful KR bridges.
>    - Stateful KR Bridge: Call out that “stateful knowledge systems” can
>    include spatial/graph representations (e.g., 3D/Euclidean graphs) to avoid
>    ambiguity with purely text/vector stores.
>    - Interop/Test Vectors: Add a non‑normative deliverable for an
>    interoperability test corpus (sample AgentIDL specs + SHACL shapes +
>    example semantic logs) so implementers have concrete fixtures.
>    - Discovery/Hypermedia: In the “Interaction Semantics/Conformance”
>    section, a brief nod to discovery (hypermedia entry points, well‑known
>    URIs) would anchor the charter to Web architecture best practices.
>
> I’m happy to contribute examples for the stateful KR bridge and semantic
> logs if that’s useful. The charter structure and decision model look good
> to me.
>
>
>
> Daniel
>