Simple 'Graph tech' videos...

I would really appreciate some simple, designed for people who barely
understand how to use a smart-phone / apps; videos (youtube, etc.)
about how RDF / SemWeb / Graph tech works.

It seems, if you try to talk about the ability to pull data from 'the
network' people have NFI how choices relate to their rights (re: use of
public funds) to support #AccessToJustice.

In-turn; this gets to the heart of why RWW was an important thing to spend
countless hours progressing freely, in the interests of #HumanRights, etc.

Far beyond the CG filled with unpaid contributors; W3C obviously
incorporates an array of global organisations.

Perhaps they should also be asked to provide, for humanitarian purposes,
simple videos to explain what it is and how it is, they're so very involved
(via humans) in deciding the future of our inalienable human rights; and
whether or not, it'll end-up getting better for 'consumers' / 'humanity' at
large.

The RWW Community was established on forging a future that was intended to
be 'better for humanity', as far as i'm aware; as far as i am aware were
the predicates; linked to 'patent pool protected' royalty free standards,
as is required to protect freedom of thought.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zXqHIJJVxk

tell me, by all means, the sentiments about human rights are not shared.  I
will then be empowered to employ those statements to make better decisions
in future.  Yet, its impossible presently for me to believe that the
consequential commercialisation schedule for linked 'technologies', is
driven by anything other than those so focus on the money; when so many
worked, without that in-front-of-mind; other than to seek benefit, for
having made awesome work (with others) for the betterment of humanity..
etc.  Seems to me, so many who took-up the consequence of these works,
don't understand it; and, well.  how does it actually help the vulnerable
when governments say, it'll be used to limit socio-economic participation
to those who do not have a valid W3C credential at that time.  As i engaged
with, years ago, WebID via its documentation; did not support the various
elements required to support an ecosystem that could in-turn support human
agency, with AI.

notwithstanding conversations about 'personal ontologies' or whatever else;
the world is in distress.

As far as i can tell...  And, given my heritage being linked to a large
pathology company (and pathologist) it also doesn't make any sense to me,
other than to commercialise globally a health-system via tech, as to forge
a solution intended to improve the circumstances of Americans.

from 2015 (pre-chartered, as was the intent of the call, to get done);
https://soundcloud.com/ubiquitous-au/credentialscgtelecon2015-06-02medical

The humanity of a person should only be attacked on the basis of facts.  I
have alot of facts, but some relate to vulnerable persons relating to
use-cases about vulnerable persons, that are fairly undignified for the
'data subject' to disclose.  So tell me, about human rights? What do you
support?

because facts should outweigh the benefits of wrong-doings, afaik; or tell
me,show me why those sorts of moral values, those sorts of philosophical
engineering[1] considerations are actually false.?

as i've survived, stuff, others have not.  I see no dignity for having done
the right thing, by the choices others have made leveraging the
circumstances in which the dignity of others should be preserved.  IMO
there are several areas relating to the future of human dignity[2] that
need to be better figured out than my intentionally crappy works[3] linked
to an identifier[4] harmed, without available legal recourse; in addition
to the fact, that the harms made, resulted in distortions of various forms
as to manufacture a case that has not reasonable association to reality; as
is a form of causality related attack, for the benefit of those who
succeeded.   If the implications were just about me, that wouldn't lead to
a complaint about it; rather, i'm seeing stuff, protests world-wide, that
seemingly may support an underlying reason for it, impacting millions if
not billions.

Fact is, if human rights were important, there'd be an RDF ontological URI
Framework for it.

please, by all means, send me those URIs, show me how i started the work on
them; after they were already made by others...  because, regardless of the
issues - these sorts of URIs are important,

for humanity.

given the apparent absence of them;  where are the videos showing, for
kids, what's being made to impact their lives via 'vaccine passports' and
related 'web infrastructure' as is impactful upon their human rights[4]...
as when others in the commercial space tell me, i wasted my time; it's hard
to provide evidence to show reasonably why i should disagree with their
rational point of view on it.

yet, if i had of not made the 'royalty free, patent pool protected' 'web
means' for 'freedom of thought', then i'd be far richer, having a
completely different sort of life; as may be best demonstrated to others
who may in future face a choice about what it is the best thing to do,
is...

#Causality. It has implications, imo.

Regards,

Timothy Holborn.
[1] https://www.w3.org/2007/09/map/main.jpg
[2] https://www.ohchr.org/en/udhr/pages/udhrindex.aspx
[3] https://github.com/webcivics/ontologies
[4] https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx