Re: Temporal Web: A Syntatic definition of 'space time' (RDF for 'status of observers').

45:37 - 47:15[1]  - space time vs. perception (upon receipt by an
'observer', in a quantum dynamic environment?)

not 'luminary' in this field; just an 'interested observer', whilst seeking
to get a 'job done right'...  (have cc'd Paul, who has more 'cred' in the
area - nb: paul - list join link[2])

(i note, the underlying 'linkages' associated with any-such pursuit, would
seemingly be associated with denoting a 'good actor' from a 'bad actor', by
temporal analysis, et.al.)

I was hopeful Melvin might be an 'luminary light' in this area, given his
background...

Timothy Holborn.\

[1] https://youtu.be/k_ZTNmkIiBc?t=2737
[2] https://www.w3.org/community/rww/


On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 23:38, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 23:34, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sounds 'crazy' when i think about it; but not, without merit?
>>
>> The concept of the 'status of the observer' has an array of temporal
>> facets linked to it; that denotes how a natural person both; experiences
>> time, and 'knowledge', in relation to time.
>>
>> Another diversity is that there are different calendars or ways of
>> denoting date/time.
>>
>> SO, what's the syntactic 'root' that can be used to 'bond' or 'bind'
>> agents to; normatively.
>>
>> seems like a root formula to me; but i don't have any easy answers for
>> it...
>>
>> therein; considerations bring about considerations linked to the
>> psychological, that associates to 'moral grammar' or behavioural
>> analytics.  A person may be 'mislead' about some 'discriminatory' factor
>> associated with an entity; through which time, they're behaviour is skewed
>> by a particular (unfounded, by real-world facts / reality) belief; yet that
>> should not necessarily denote the 'sentiment' of a person...
>>
>> as 'false beliefs' may have influenced the position and causality linked
>> to an agents behaviour, as a consequence of 'bad knowledge' (which is still
>> information, just not necessarily, appropriately categorised).
>>
>> the sort of thing i think this has an impact on; would include social
>> systems that seek a form of productivity curve / efficiency, and linked
>> barriers / barrier analysis.
>>
>> but the underlying consideration is; if / when, defining an ontological
>> structure for a 'temporal web', how are the foundational formats defined?
>>
>> what's the constant...  or something like that...
>>
>> as noted - have a belief, those like melvin can steward us into something
>> other than oblivion...
>>
>> Timothy Holborn.
>>
>>
> Brings forth a much more significant consideration; about (social)
> temporal semantics...
>
> Timothy Holborn...
>

Received on Monday, 24 May 2021 15:35:25 UTC