- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 23:34:51 +1000
- To: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok1eV5DnxdMGMY5h-MBCUNzSNNchOUmCZkX=N7Zb3f-5sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sounds 'crazy' when i think about it; but not, without merit? The concept of the 'status of the observer' has an array of temporal facets linked to it; that denotes how a natural person both; experiences time, and 'knowledge', in relation to time. Another diversity is that there are different calendars or ways of denoting date/time. SO, what's the syntactic 'root' that can be used to 'bond' or 'bind' agents to; normatively. seems like a root formula to me; but i don't have any easy answers for it... therein; considerations bring about considerations linked to the psychological, that associates to 'moral grammar' or behavioural analytics. A person may be 'mislead' about some 'discriminatory' factor associated with an entity; through which time, they're behaviour is skewed by a particular (unfounded, by real-world facts / reality) belief; yet that should not necessarily denote the 'sentiment' of a person... as 'false beliefs' may have influenced the position and causality linked to an agents behaviour, as a consequence of 'bad knowledge' (which is still information, just not necessarily, appropriately categorised). the sort of thing i think this has an impact on; would include social systems that seek a form of productivity curve / efficiency, and linked barriers / barrier analysis. but the underlying consideration is; if / when, defining an ontological structure for a 'temporal web', how are the foundational formats defined? what's the constant... or something like that... as noted - have a belief, those like melvin can steward us into something other than oblivion... Timothy Holborn.
Received on Monday, 24 May 2021 13:35:42 UTC