Re: Discord

On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 03:09, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote:

> Quoting Timothy Holborn (2021-05-21 18:55:27)
> > I don't mind the method; my 'problem' is, that as i'm putting hours
> > into this as i believe the work has a sense of urgency, and i'm in a
> > position where i can put time into it - the ability to work through
> > issues - prior to putting derivatives onto the list (reducing /
> > improving list traffic as the 'important decision making stuff' -
> > well, i thought a bunch of #Channels via a chat server, might help
> > with that (but, i don't want drama).  Also, overtime, I suspect we'll
> > need a means to have meetings that achieve quorum and get
> > resolutions...
> >
> > intention was to contribute towards progress (not hindrances).
>
> If urgency is paramount, then simply go ahead and use Discord.
>
> I did not veto your work, only informed that I will not use it.


And i both took notice; and was concerned by the implication of your
sentiments...

So, its there (created it before i made the thread) but equally, no-one
else used the link (perhaps consequential... IDK)...

TCH.

>
>
>
>  - Jonas
>
> --
>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private