- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 20:20:41 +0000
- To: Ruben Verborgh <Ruben.Verborgh@UGent.be>, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- CC: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
Here’s how I imagine splitting the hair using Schema.org: ex:A0 a schema:ImageObject; schema:fileFormat “image/jpeg”, “image/png”; schema:contentUrl “http://some.com/img/19f87c54-bb97-4aa7-8163-166e3858f45e”. That way conneg on the linked data URI (ex:A0) won’t cross wires with conneg on the image URI. Jeff On 2/9/17, 3:04 PM, "Ruben Verborgh" <Ruben.Verborgh@UGent.be> wrote: > image content negotiation breaks with Accept: */*, and we > cannot control its default value in browsers. That's indeed what https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Why_not_conneg means. Now the question is for what applications this poses a problem. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1249474 is an example, but this is not a Semantic Web application. Your original mail seemed to indicate a possibility that it breaks Linked Data platforms, but I don't see that yet. Best, Ruben
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2017 20:21:17 UTC