Re: Working Draft

Not yet. Maybe ISO15926 could help. But the objective is to provide
'Semantic Object Mapping' by means of type-object pattern.


On Dec 15, 2017 2:07 PM, "Peter brooks" <> wrote:

Do you have a tentative proposal for what that upper ontology might look

Just a small graphviz graph would help clarify what you are saying.

Sent from my iPad

On 15 Dec 2017, at 17:54, Sebastian Samaruga <> wrote:

Hi all,

I know I've been publishing a series of posts that maybe lacks of academic
formality or shape / coherence. My intentions are not to spam the lists
with content that maybe don't deserve the reading time of the subscribers.
That's why I warn everybody that I'm just a Semantic 'hobbyist' dumping
thoughts in a bottle.

Feel free to skip reading my mesagges. Although sometimes I receive very
valuable feedback, sometimes people seems bothered with what I publish.

My attempt now is finally to start writting code. I've added an appendix to
the document which explains details I didn't realized in the past and which
are fundamental for the deployment of an implementation (WIP, fuzzy draft).
I've also suffered of paralysis in an 'analysis' phase in which because of
lack knowledge and work responsabilities I couldn't code much.

The idea is to write a very small functional API library for the processing
of streams (bus) of models of knowledge (resources) and their contexts
(templates) from which to apply aggregation and alignment / inference.
Then, given opportune APIs, provide implementations of connectors and
'deployers' wrapper endpoints

Again, this is a very fuzzy early draft of a document WIP which doesn't
qualify yet even as an analysis or specification document. But it's useful
for me to post it, even as a reminder of the work progress I've doing.



Received on Friday, 15 December 2017 17:11:08 UTC