- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 00:38:35 +0200
- To: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKTFsM0mp+dsSqY6Ub2599kG=2UPGavrdyiR+81RsU03Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 7 April 2017 at 00:33, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > I think this is correct? I'm going to conclude that the Linked Data > Platform is a replacement for WebDAV with Semantic Web enhancements. > > http://stko.geog.ucsb.edu/sw2022/sw2022_paper3.pdf > " > Several proposals exist to enable machine-writable structured data. For > instance, Tim Berners-Lee himself proposed update protocols based on > WebDAV or SPARQL/Update [2] and implemented them in Tabulator. > Lanthaler et al. tried to obtain a read-write Web of Data by integrating > Web APIs into it (in the form of JSON services) [6]. Recently, W3C > started a standardization activity to create a Linked Data Platform, > with as main goal to define a RESTful way to read and write Linked > Data [3]." > Not sure I would use the term replacement. Many implementations support both LDP and WebDAV. My view on LDP is that it's a way to webize the file system. This leads to being able to do web type stuff with files, and file system type stuff on the web. Both are useful. > > https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter (LDP charter) > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebDAV (about WebDav) > https://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/whats-new/ (mentions proxy from WebDav to > LDP) > > -Brent Shambaugh > > GitHub: https://github.com/bshambaugh > Website: http://bshambaugh.org/ > LinkedIN: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brent-shambaugh-9b91259 > Skype: brent.shambaugh > Twitter: https://twitter.com/Brent_Shambaugh > >
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:39:09 UTC