- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:14:34 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLiWMHAObOR8V4QioLFFxZ_jVX63CZiPfafM4d+JJesLQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 25 January 2016 at 01:55, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 1/24/16 2:54 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > I wanted to highlight this issue raised by Sandro Hawke relating to > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl > > "Servers are required to recognize the class *foaf:Agent* as the class of > all agents. This indicates that the given access is public. In some cases > this will mean that authentication is therefore not required, and may be > skipped. When a resource is being written, however, it may be necessary to > associate the change with some kind of ID for accountability purposes." > > Here is the issue: > > https://github.com/solid/solid/issues/35 > > I think proposal is to change this to rdf : Resource to be more general. > > Any thoughts on this? > > > I don't believe ACLs are foaf:Agent specific. When I make an > acl:authorization instance, the object of its acl:agent_class relation > doesn't have to be a foaf:Agent. > > [1] http://www.openlinksw.com/c/9NVXKWB -- acl:agent_class relation > description. > Right. But as LDP is a webization of the UNIX file system. WebAccessControl is roughly a webization of UNIX permissions. In UNIX permissions you have the concepts: User Group Everyone We have a webiziation of User namely WebID, a URI that denotes an Agent (not necessarily FOAF, but that is the hint). Perhaps it's possible to specify everyone and group more clearly? Everyone -- An Agent? A FOAF Agent? anyURI? Group -- A FOAF Group or something else? As a server, how do we check membership in a group, I think is the question? > -- > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com > Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this > >
Received on Monday, 25 January 2016 07:15:04 UTC