- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 05:22:12 +0100
- To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2014 04:22:41 UTC
On 2 January 2014 01:26, Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl> wrote: > 01.01.2014 22:24, Melvin Carvalho: > >> https://web-payments.org/specs/source/web-identity/ >> > And the authz proposal http://tools.ietf.org/html/ > draft-cavage-http-signatures-00 This spec has been updated and fleshed out quite a bit. Section 4 now includes reading, writing, access control, signatures, claims and endorsements. https://web-payments.org/specs/source/web-identity/ There's been some interesting discussion on the web payments list about using various read write technologies such as PATCH / PUT / DELETE, SPARQL Update, Talis Changeset etc. > > >> This is some work going on in the web payments community group. >> >> Still a very early draft, but it may be interesting to compare how the >> payments group does identity compared with this groups efforts. >> >> Bear in mind that there's quite a bit of industry backing behind >> payments, including active participation from Mozilla, so this set of >> specs may end up winning the race to become w3c RECs. >> > > > -- > Dominik Tomaszuk > Research Fellow > University of Bialystok > Poland >
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2014 04:22:41 UTC