- From: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:20:22 +0200
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- Cc: Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFG79ehPktZsxVOCDtDZ4=ivwWPoMUXF70efcQ+K=7Z=jYRJyg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ashok and thanks for the link. Indeed, it is too heavyweight, though if I'm not mistaken, it was the basis for the AIR Web Rule Language ( http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2009/AIR/). We will discuss everything once we get started. Best, Andrei On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>wrote: > Look also at the work on a Policy Aware Web, for example: > http://www.w3.org/2004/09/Policy-Aware-Web-acl.pdf > I think this approach is too heavyweight but we can discuss. > All the best, Ashok > > On 10/19/2013 4:26 AM, Andrei Sambra wrote: > > Hello again, > > Thank you all for expressing your interest. I would like to keep this > thread open for a few more days, to get an estimate of how many people are > interested in participating. Until then, please familiarize yourselves with > the WAC ontology (in case you haven't already), and maybe compile a list of > topics you feel we should bring up. > > Best, > Andrei > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Erich Bremer <erich@ebremer.com> wrote: > >> Hi Andrei, >> >> I am interested in participating. I've been looking to add WAC to >> VIVO to work with the WebID4VIVO that we have created to allow inter-VIVO >> operations. -- Erich >> >> Erich Bremer >> http://www.ebremer.com >> >> >> On 10/17/13 9:05 AM, Andrei Sambra wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> For those of you who know me, please skip this paragraph. For the >> others, I would first like to introduce myself. My name is Andrei Sambra >> and for the past three years I have been involved in different W3C groups, >> such as WebID, LDP and RWW (co-chair). As an advocate of Semantic Web >> technologies, especially those taking user privacy into consideration, I am >> currently working on two projects, MyProfile [1] (WebID provider / social >> network) and RWW.IO [2], the later including support for WebID, LDP and >> WAC [3]. RWW.IO is a Read/Write Web-based personal data store. >> >> Over the past few years, we have noticed that Linked Data is no longer >> a technology limited to the public space, finding its way into consumer >> applications. As a consequence, it becomes increasingly important to be >> able to protect access to private/sensitive resources. To this regard, the Web >> Access Control (WAC) ontology [3] has been put together by Tim Berners-Lee, >> offering the basic means to set up ACLs. Due to its nature (i.e. an >> ontology) however, it does not provide the formalism necessary to implement >> it in order to achieve interoperability, nor does it provide an organized >> space where it can be discussed and improved. >> >> The reason behind writing the email is that I would like to know how >> many people are interested in participating to the standardization process >> of a Web Access Control spec. >> >> The Read Write Web community group has so far been the host of >> inquiries regarding the WAC ontology. However, being a community group, it >> does not have access to W3C's teleconference system, nor to the issue >> tracking system. Depending on your interest in a WAC spec, and the >> preliminary discussions we might have, we may very well have to create a >> dedicated working group. For now however, I suggest we use the public >> RWW list (public-rww@w3.org) in order to coordinate the efforts on this >> subject. >> >> Please let me know how you stand on this subject and perhaps suggest a >> way to count who is interested in participating (doodle, something else >> maybe?). >> >> Best wishes, >> Andrei >> >> [1] https://my-profile.eu/ >> [2] https://rww.io/ >> [3] http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl >> >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 09:21:12 UTC