Re: SPARQL 1.1 Specifications are W3C Recommendations

On 29 March 2013 15:18, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:

> On 3/29/13 9:59 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>> The SPARQL Working Group has completed development of its full-featured
>> system for querying and managing data using the flexible RDF data model. It
>> has now published eleven Recommendations for SPARQL 1.1, detailed in SPARQL
>> 1.1 Overview. SPARQL 1.1 extends the 2008 Recommendation for SPARQL 1.0 by
>> adding features to the query language such as aggregates, subqueries,
>> negation, property paths, and an expanded set of functions and operators.
>> Beyond the query language, SPARQL 1.1 adds other features that were widely
>> requested, including update, service description, a JSON results format,
>> and support for entailment reasoning.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/**2013/03/21/eleven-sparql-1-1-**
>> specifications-are-w3c-**recommendations/<http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2013/03/21/eleven-sparql-1-1-specifications-are-w3c-recommendations/>
>>
>
> SPARQL Update is very important to this community group. It basically
> means you can perform the following sequences of commands against a SPARQL
> endpoint (subject to endpoint ACLs):
>
> # copy graph <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests:data> to graph
> <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests2:data>
> # move graph <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests:data> to graph
> <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests3:data>
> # Verify using:
> # select * from <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests:data> where {?s ?p ?o}
> # no records == verified
> # select * from <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests3:data> where {?s ?p ?o}
> # one or more records == verified.
> # Add new records to the empty graph <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests:data> using:
> # insert into graph <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests:data> {<#kidehen> owl:sameAs<
> http://kingsley.**idehen.net/dataspace/person/**kidehen#this<http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this>
> >}
> # add data from graph <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests:data> to graph
> <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests3:data> using:
> # add graph <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests:data> to graph
> <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests3:data>
> # select * from <urn:sparql:11:qa:tests3:data> where {?s ?p ?o}
> # two or more records == verified.
>

Yes, I still think we should try and get /well-known/.sparql registered
with IANA

There were some objections about read and write being in the same place,
tho.


>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/**blog/~kidehen<http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen>
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/**112399767740508618350/about<https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about>
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/**kidehen<http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen>
>
>
>
>
>
>