Re: Fwd: LDP 1.0 editor drafts ready for Last Call

On 25 July 2013 16:29, Sebastian Tramp <tramp@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:21:35PM +0200, Jürgen Jakobitsch SWC wrote:
>
> If someone is interested in a node.js implementation of LDP, node_ldp is
> your
> friend: https://github.com/AKSW/node_ldp
> (sorry jürgen for capturing the thread :-)
>

Great news, the java and node implementations look great.

I'm more interested in the node version at present time.  Which libraries
are the parsing and serialization based on ... I noticed an import of
raptor ...


>
> Best regards
>
> Sebastian Tramp
>
> > hi,
> >
> > just wrote the following to the ldp mailing list (not the ldp-wg one)
> > (maybe i find someone here to join the project)
> >
> >
> > i just started with another implementation of the LDP recom.
> > it is based on the servlet API and will be realized as a simple
> > serlvet that needs to extended (analog to HttpServlet) to fit whatever
> > datasource.
> > the main logic will go into a GenericLDPServlet. Extensions of this
> > servlet will need to implement something like a dereference or a sparql
> > method.
> >
> > the main motivation behind this approach is to create a ldp impl that
> > a broad audience is able to install on an existing environment (tomcat,
> > jboss, websphere, any compliant servlet container) and to make the logic
> > behind ldp (post, get, put, delete,...) datasource independent. it will
> > only be necessary to implement methods like dereference or sparql
> > specific to a certain datasource (i'll start with a reference impl based
> > on openrdf's sesame).
> >
> > i put online the source of the ultra alpha sandbox online at github [1].
> > take a look a GenericLDPServlet [2] to get an idea where i want to go.
> >
> > i'd really appreciate any comments on this approach and would be happy
> > if someone would like to join.
> >
> > wkr jürgen
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/turnguard/com-turnguard-ldp
> > [2]
> >
> https://github.com/turnguard/com-turnguard-ldp/blob/master/com-turnguard-ldp-utils/com-turnguard-ldp-utils-servlet/src/main/java/com/turnguard/ldp/utils/servlet/base/GenericLDPServlet.java
> >
> > On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 21:05 +0200, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> > > FYI:  Linked data platform is going to last call.  It's a way to
> > > remotely store and change data using the common HTTP verbs of GET PUT
> > > DELETE.  And also it allows for 'containers' of resources, which
> > > operate in a similar way to directories in a file system.
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
> > > Date: 24 July 2013 20:10
> > > Subject: LDP 1.0 editor drafts ready for Last Call
> > > To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
> > >
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > >
> > > I believe I have covered all outstanding editor tasks that we agreed
> > > upon prior to going to "Last Call" [1].  The draft is available [2]
> > > and will have the change history removed prior to publication.
> > >
> > >
> > > I will go forward now with requesting publication.
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] - http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-07-22#resolution_2
> > > [2] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html
> > >
> > > I should also note that the vocabulary document [3] is current with
> > > the draft.
> > > [3] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.ttl
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > - Steve Speicher
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> WebID: http://sebastian.tramp.name
>

Received on Saturday, 27 July 2013 13:57:11 UTC