- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 10:56:31 +0200
- To: "public-lod@w3.org Data" <public-lod@w3.org>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>, Joe Presbrey <presbrey@gmail.com>, Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
On 10 Aug 2013, at 00:18, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >> When talking about this with Alexandre Bertails he thought that rel="meta" was >> not the right relation and that rel="acl" would be more correct. > > Yes. > > It will be fixed. We need to get those who have implementations to agree on this first. :-) And I am not sure what forum is available where we can agree on edits to the acl ontolgy or the http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl wiki page, so I am sending this mail a bit widely around. The WebAccessControl wiki page suggests that the RWW Community Group is the place to discuss this. I suppose for the moment the WebAccessControl wiki page plays the role of a spec. It says: [[ The client follows, for example, an HTTP header field: Link: <meta/profile.meta>; rel=meta ]] Alexandre Bertails once argued that meta is too general, and that this should be an "acl" link. Neither "acl" nor "meta" are registered in the iana document http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml which is I think where this needs to be registered. See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-6.1 For us to register this we should probably have something a bit more spec like than the wiki page. I also would like to add to the ontology - support for regular expressions on urls - a acl:include relation to include acls from other documents Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Saturday, 10 August 2013 08:57:04 UTC