On 04/04/2013, at 4:18 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > All, > > I think the HTTP "From:" header [1] is now truly archaic circa. 2013. If the range of this particular predicate was a URI it would really aid our quest for a RWW. It's in active use by spiders and robots. > Suggestion: > > As part of our RWW bootstrap effort, we could consider an "X-From:" header that basically takes a URI or Literal value. > > I think we can flesh this out across WebID and RWW via implementations before moving up to TAG and IETF. > > Mark: what do you think, anyway ? :-) If you want something that takes a link, we have a Link header. Whatever you do, don't prefix it with X-. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 23:02:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:10:40 UTC