- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:22:59 -0400
- To: public-webid@w3.org, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 17:23:25 UTC
On 4/3/13 1:18 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > All, > > I think the HTTP "From:" header [1] is now truly archaic circa. 2013. > If the range of this particular predicate was a URI it would really > aid our quest for a RWW. > > Suggestion: > > As part of our RWW bootstrap effort, we could consider an "X-From:" > header that basically takes a URI or Literal value. > > I think we can flesh this out across WebID and RWW via implementations > before moving up to TAG and IETF. > > Mark: what do you think, anyway ? :-) > Missing link: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-14.22 . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 17:23:25 UTC