- From: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:19:26 -0500
- Cc: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFG79ehG=iqDmJvDyZrDxEa+MAFShsQUKqwpFUa0vba=iK093g@mail.gmail.com>
Hello all, So it seems that in the end we still need a vocabulary to convey that we the user of a certain application. With the risk of hijacking this thread, I would like to suggest that we also look for a way of describing what an app is capable of. For example: * does it allow users to create a WebID account * does it support WebID authn * does it allow users to send messages * does it offer a public/private Wall * etc. Andrei On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:09 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ < perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > Excerpts from Kingsley Idehen's message of 2012-11-29 12:55:20 +0000: > > On 11/28/12 7:22 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > > > > so how about plink : uses ? > > > > > > but then again I could say I use public transport, but that doesnt > > > indicate that it is a webapp ... > > > > So in your profile document you can state: > > > > > > <#i> <#use> <SomeApp>. > > <SomeApp> a <#application> . > > <#application> owl:equivalentClass <SomeSharedOntologyClass> . > > > > # or > > > > <#application> rdfs:subClassOf <SomeSharedOntologyClass> . > > > > etc.. > > > > Just do what you would do in the real world with natural language. > > Describe the world as you see it and then expand to the broader world > > via connections. > > do you have recommendations of where to discuss choosing some common > vocabularies for modeling certain domains? > > this website looks like a great reference but i don't find any space for > open community interaction there :( > http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/ (editors in cc) > >
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:20:16 UTC