- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:15:47 -0500
- To: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <50B670F3.2070500@openlinksw.com>
On 11/28/12 2:50 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > Excerpts from Nathan's message of 2012-11-28 19:28:06 +0000: >> ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: >>> Excerpts from Kingsley Idehen's message of 2012-11-28 18:13:19 +0000: >>>> On 11/28/12 12:36 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>>>> On 28 November 2012 18:32, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org >>>>> <mailto:nathan@webr3.org>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Part of the RWW is a clean separation between apps, data and >>>>> identiry. >>>>> >>>>> I was wondering if there's a convenient single predicate to >>>>> add a webapp to >>>>> a profile page. >>>>> >>>>> Currently I use foaf : interest which isnt really accurate. >>>>> >>>>> We were thinking about creating >>>>> >>>>> plink : webapp >>>>> >>>>> As per http://ontologi.es/ >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts on this? >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be awesome when we can finally start adding >>>>> apps to our >>>>> pages. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Somehow I don't follow lol, why would we link from our foaf to an >>>>> app? and in what capacity? >>>>> >>>>> - saying "I created/contribute to this app" >>>>> - saying "this is my account on website/app x" (eg this is my twitter) >>>>> - something else? >>>>> >>>>> (generally I'd thought we'd link to our data, and then different >>>>> apps of a users preference would consume/display that data) >>>>> >>>>> Apologies for the confusing, I think I'm just missing a little >>>>> context somwhere :D >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's similar to when you add an app to facebook or google plus. Then >>>>> you get a link in your sidebar of your profile to say, your calendar, >>>>> tasks, etc. >>>>> >>>>> Also then other people can see what apps you use >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nath >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Yes, so you have "use" as the verb in the sentence: I use X . Thus, you >>>> can just start with a Turtle file that states: >>>> >>>> # start >>>> >>>> <#i> <#use> <SomeApp>. >>>> >>>> #if you find a preferred predicate from a shared vocabulary or ontology, >>>> you can just add: >>>> <#use> rdfs:subPropertyOf <NewlyDiscoveredPredictateURI> . >>>> >>>> # OR >>>> >>>> <#use> owl:equivalentProperty <NewlyDiscoveredPredictateURI> . >>>> >>>> # end >>>> >>>> It just depends on what you are trying to say, don't be distracted by >>>> the search for a perfect predicate from a shared vocabulary etc.. >>> thanks for this tip! >>> >>> how does it work later on when i start writing queries? >> Inference is quite simple. >> >> If you have <a> <b> <c> . and <b> sameAs <d> . then most decent >> engines/stores will add the inferred triple <a> <d> <c> to the dataset, >> so your query works whether you've used <b> or <d> :) > thanks for clarifying! > > so things can get tricky if given technology doesn't support inference, like for example currently rdfstore-js > https://github.com/antoniogarrote/rdfstore-js > > > > Then just follow-your-nose manually. Basically, you can insert the ontology or vocabulary triples into your local store etc.. You start with you little Turtle. Then ingest the ontology documents as an when you need to exploit their classs and/or property definitions. If we weren't so distracted by unnecessary stuff, circa. 2012, everyone would be enjoying the wonderment of the deconstruction black box DBMS technology and its reconstruction in the form of Open Webby Data Management, Access, and Integration. Our eyes currently remain (for the most part) "wide shut" . Links: 1. http://bit.ly/NC1yaP -- Deconstructing the DBMS presentation (Video) 2. http://bit.ly/TukMoB -- Co-Relational DBMS article 3. http://bit.ly/YTdz3N -- Entity Relationship Model dissertation by Peter Chen. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 20:16:09 UTC