- From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:27:24 -0500
- To: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- CC: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
On 11/21/2012 11:04 AM, Henry Story wrote: > I am not sure the RWW mailing list is the right place to send this message, > as they have not followed the debate. I think we need a wiki page that lists > the pros and cons of each of the issues below, if you are going to bring new > people to the conversation. > > On 21 Nov 2012, at 16:49, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > >> All, >> >> As per a variety of threads re. the matter of the definition of a WebID, I kindly request a simple +1, -1, or 0 vote on the following issue of concern: >> >> Should a WebID be defined specifically as a hash based HTTP URI? > > "Specifically" is not clear. It's not clear because the definition is not complete. I mean, it's missing the goal (identity) and some other "constraints" (like the default serialization format). Voting without those will not solve anything. I would vote "again" for the definition we had agreed upon at TPAC [1]. [[ RESOLUTION: "A WebID is a hash HTTP URI which denotes an Agent. You can GET an RDF model as TURTLE. ]] Alexandre. [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webid-minutes.html#webid-definition > > In terms of language we can use MUST, SHOULD etc. > > So perhaps you can rephrase it in those terms. > > [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri > [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri > [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP hash uri > > in all cases of course we agree that the URI MUST refer to an agent as described in the current spec. > > Is this better? > > >> >> Note: >> Most of use are extremely time challenged, and really need to make decisions and set priorities re. this matter. Thus, I would like those with a vested interest in this matter to vote. >> >> This is an informative endeavor. >> >> Poll Question: >> Do you support defining a WebID *specifically* as a hash based HTTP URI? >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Kingsley Idehen >> Founder & CEO >> OpenLink Software >> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen >> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about >> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen >> >> >> >> >> > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ >
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:28:28 UTC