- From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:09:35 -0500
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:10:22 UTC
ok, can't let this go.... <snip> This couples your access control to your URI structure. </snip> yes, it does. i *always* (as far back as i can remember) secure the interface (resources on the server) via the URL. in fact, i use: Access[true/false] = (URL + Protocol_Method + User_Identity) for first-line authorization. tell me why this is a problem. mca+1.859.757.1449 skype: mca.amundsen http://amundsen.com/blog/ http://twitter.com/mamund https://github.com/mamund http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeamundsen On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Ruben Verborgh wrote: > >> It is often useful to be able to specify that all resources in a >>> collection ( a directory ) or a whole namespace (say all resources >>> under /user/jack/.* >>> >> >> This couples your access control to your URI structure. I’m not sure you >> want to do that. >> > > Agreed. > > >
Received on Sunday, 18 November 2012 17:10:22 UTC