- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:01:10 +0100
- To: j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at
- Cc: "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <03174502-3AAC-48D4-A4F2-4ACE44DBF662@bblfish.net>
On 12 Nov 2012, at 22:52, Jürgen Jakobitsch <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at> wrote: > hi, > > since the discussion on AC is apparently taking shape, it might be a > good time for my questions. yes, note also the LDP working groups new wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/AccessControl Their aim is not it seems to choose a solution. See the introduction of that page. > > until now we more or less only had examples of AC in action on the > data-retrieval side (as far as i know at least). > > do acl-engines only really work with inference-engines when updating or > are there recommended ways of dealing with the following example? > > prereq.: acl - denies access to resource "x" (say a skos:Concept) In my view it is better if acls are on resources/documents. Doing access control on concepts does not really make sense I think, and is a lot more complicated. Concepts are not things people can own: documents, or resources published by servers ( which are agents of some sort ) can be guarded on the other hand. > > what should happen, when i add the triple? > > resource "y" skos:broader resource "x"? > > > there are several scenarios in which this could take place : > > 1. should the update request be rejected with full inferencing, because > it becomes clear the resource "x" is touched? > 2. what happens in a non-inferencing environment? with that is created a > relation between the two resources and i could construct (sparql-wise) > whatever i want, which brings me to the idea of never trusting > application/sparql-results+*... > > > so the crucial point seems to be that ACLs can handle updates more > flexible, a read and write access denied for a single resource might not > be enough. > > any pointer to the most flexible acl-ontology? > i'm thinking about something like : > > denyWriteAccess where resource "x" is the object. > > any pointer really appreciated.. > > wkr turnguard > > > > > > -- > | Jürgen Jakobitsch, > | Software Developer > | Semantic Web Company GmbH > | Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8 > | A - 1070 Wien, Austria > | Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22 > > COMPANY INFORMATION > | web : http://www.semantic-web.at/ > | foaf : http://company.semantic-web.at/person/juergen_jakobitsch > PERSONAL INFORMATION > | web : http://www.turnguard.com > | foaf : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard > | g+ : https://plus.google.com/111233759991616358206/posts > | skype : jakobitsch-punkt > | xmlns:tg = "http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard#" Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 22:01:44 UTC