- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:57:56 +0100
- To: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-fedsocweb@w3.org" <public-fedsocweb@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <A2C44E97-46EF-4B39-9314-180D0E24AAEA@bblfish.net>
On 9 Nov 2012, at 10:53, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > On 7 Nov 2012, at 18:19, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The TPAC meeting in Lyon was I think quite clearly a great success. So to follow up on this the WebID XG is organising a Teleconf on the W3C system to help move things to the next stage. >> I got the following slot for this Friday: >> >> Fridays 15:00-16:00 UTC (10:00am-11:00am Boston local) >> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 93243 ("WEBID") >> 30 participants >> other timezones: http://timeanddate.com/s/2a4w >> ( there are phone numbers for other parts of the world, does anyone have a list of those? ) > > There are no more teleconf numbers in the rest of the world, but that's ok because you can use free voice over IP calling to connect. > This is explained here: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP > > There are a number of VOIP clients around. For example on apple there is > http://icanblink.com/ I forgot to mention that we are also on IRC irc://irc.w3.org:6665/%23webid which is key to getting this all to work correctly. > > > >> >> Here is the proposed agenda for this teleconf: >> >> 1) Overview of what happened at TPAC >> The summary is online, but there are some things that are difficult to put in writing. >> http://www.w3.org/community/rww/wiki/TPAC-Lyon-2012 >> ( eg. how the W3C process works and why it is useful ) >> >> 2) The LDP group has to create a note laying some basic principles for what an >> Access Control System should look like, but they don't want to get sidetracked in >> an implementeable spec. Should we as part of the RWW take on to put something together here? >> >> 3) The WebID definition was changed at the meeting, but this lead to a lot of pushback on the mailing list. I proposed this as a compromise >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2012Nov/0020.html >> Is this an improvement? >> >> 4) Most important: is this date ok to continue having WebID/RWW/SocialWeb meetings for >> everybody? We could have those topics take turns so that we don't get tired with the same topic, and as this would help us enlarge our horizons. >> >> >> Henry >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 14:58:35 UTC