- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:55:49 -0400
- To: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5092C5B5.4000803@openlinksw.com>
On 11/1/12 2:07 PM, Joe Presbrey wrote: > Here's a sample rule from the wiki: > > [acl:accessTo <card.rdf>; acl:mode acl:Read, acl:agentClass foaf:Agent]. > > Quick question with regard to acl:accessTo <card.rdf>: > > Many LD servers I see also serve the same graph at <card.ttl>, > <card.json>, <card?format=json>, and/or <card> (w/ Accept: */format). > > We can't expect users to enumerate all these in their rules. Does > anyone have an example implementation of one of these kinds of > servers? > > Should we drop the type suffix (.rdf) from the wiki examples? eg. the > rule should be simply acl:accessTo <card>, and apply to all content > negotiations for the same graph. > > Best regards, > > -- > Joe Presbrey > > > +1 -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 18:56:12 UTC