- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 19:59:18 +0200
- To: wyb mail <wybmail@hotmail.com>
- Cc: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKcuw4J-696uCTJn0rPY--YMgCZxZ5VSOBhqfJoLtwd3w@mail.gmail.com>
On 23 May 2012 13:40, wyb mail <wybmail@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your reply. I meant the Wiki-page, yes. I like it, it already > gives a nice overview. **** > > Concerning some kind of standard navigation, maybe it is nice to co-create > something; As a new comer I saw some navigation issues in a few sites of > Community Groups I have participated in. A first proposal for a standard landing > page layout (I also send something like this to federative social web > group): > > > What**** > > - Introduction (context)**** > > Value**** > > - Improvement to make (ideals)**** > > How**** > > - Approach, plan, timeline (nice example: * > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-*protection/<http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/>, > but then with clickable **** > > items maybe); also how to navigate on the site**** > > Now**** > > - Participate > Action, requests for expertise, participants**** > > Done**** > > - Products so far and status (also **** > > minutes)**** > > More**** > > - Wiki (research, (links to) reports, **** > > sources)**** > > > Thanks for these pointers, I've been giving some thought about some text for these concepts and how they can be presented. I do agree we need to broaden the scope of explanations over time, and make participation more fluid, for both experts and enthusiasts. > Thanks in advance, > > kind regards, Wyb > > ------------------------------ > Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 12:23:39 +0200 > Subject: Re: Introduction and MyProfile question > From: melvincarvalho@gmail.com > To: wybmail@hotmail.com > CC: public-rww@w3.org > > > > > On 18 May 2012 17:17, wyb mail <wybmail@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have just joined the group and some other groups of W3C > As a supporter of open standards and as an Informatics student, combining > among others social sciences and ICT, > I am very curious about what you are doing and how you are working. > I hope I can contribute something to the group though I am not really an > engineer > > > Hi & Welcome! > > > > First thing I noticed looking at the different sites of the different > groups: > > How things are organized is not always clear. > > > Community groups are a restively new part of the W3C, only being started > in the last year. Feedback on how we can organize things better is always > welcome. > > > It is not easy as a new comer to jump in right away > > > Appreciated. Over time, I'd like to help work on how we can improve > things, make it more attractive, easier for new comers. > > > Your group has already a nice starting page, the main page > > > Did you mean the home page or the start page of the wiki? I recently > redid the wiki front page to a new template. > > > that gives some overview and a handful of important links, > but should't it be something that is standardized so that it becomes > easier to participate quickly? > so that it is clear right away what a group is doing at the moment, what > the plans are and what it is in need for? > > > Definitely. Community groups are less than a year old at the W3C, and I > think there are almost 100 now. Feedback on how we can make this group and > others more welcoming would be appreciated. Most of the people here are > volunteers, but personally I'm definitely keen to spend at least a few > hours a week improving things. :) > > > > I looked also at the MyProfile pages: > Is it the idea that all data about a person I could see on some pages (day > of birth, address, etc.) is public? > > > The basic idea is to use web standards (based on web architecture and HTTP > URIs) to build profiles for people that can communicate with other > networks, and log in to applications. > > I think long term some data will be public, some only you can see, and > some only available to your friends (a bit like facebook). > > Maybe Andrei Sambra (who wrote my profile) can give some more detail... > > > > > Kind regards, Wyb > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 17:59:52 UTC