- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:43:03 +0200
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>, Alexandre Bertalis <bertails@w3.org>
Sorry for taking such a long time to respond, I just came back from 6 weeks of conferences. On 25 Apr 2012, at 12:42, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:58:43 +0200 > Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > >> Is there a good reason to move to that way of doing things? How do >> others here do this? > > In WWW::DataWiki, collections are second-class citizens. A collection > cannot exist unless it contains items. > > Putting a collection/directory will fail. (Perhaps it should be > allowed but treated as a no-op?) Putting an item into a directory which > does not exist yet will create that directory (however many levels of > nesting are needed). Ok, that makes sense. I am going to be re-writing read-write-web in scala with an actor framework next, to allow for higher concurrency, so I'll be a lot more attentive to these questions in the next month. Henry > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 15:43:49 UTC