- From: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:37:57 +0200
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-rww@w3.org
OK, now i understand what you are saying! Thanks. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 5/15/12 8:53 AM, Michiel de Jong wrote: >> in the end your client will become like the new IE6. people who use it >> will have to complain a lot to webmasters, asking them to change >> existing content in order to comply with its weird non-mainstream >> quirks. >> >> Do you see the problem? Jeni explains this problem in her blogpost. I >> find it a convincing argument to stop trying to make 303s and >> hash-uri-rule obligatory. > > > The point isn't about making anything obligatory. The point is about leaving > the AWWW as it is. It handles the problem well. The fact that people get it > wrong doesn't mean you break the system. OK, I disagree with that, but at least i understand your standpoint now. Thanks for taking the extra effort of explaining it in some more detail! Cheers, Michiel
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 13:38:36 UTC