- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:17:12 -0400
- To: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4FAD1F68.9060606@openlinksw.com>
On 5/11/12 9:57 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
> On 11 May 2012 15:41, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com
> <mailto:melvincarvalho@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> This group is based on the idea of combining two Web-related
> concepts to help solve some of the long-standing challenges
> involved in building and combining software:
>
> 1. *RDF*, the Resource Description Framework, is a W3C
> Recommended <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/> general
> technique for conveying information. It has a handful of
> syntaxes, including RDF/XML
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/>, RDFa
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core/>, and Turtle
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/>, any of which can be used to
> transmit RDF statements. The items about which information is
> expressed in RDF documents are identified with URIs (eg,
> http://example.com/products/Widget-71) but the existing RDF
> specifications do not cover dereferencing them. RDF is the
> basis for Linked Data
> <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html> and the
> Semantic Web <http://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb/>.
> 2. With *RESTful APIs* and *RESTful Web Services*, clients use
> basic HTTP verbs
> <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html#sec9>,
> with their simple and direct meaning, to obtain and alter the
> state of objects on the server. In these APIs, the remote
> information objects are identified with URIs which are
> dereferenced in every operation. RESTful APIs can be defined
> independent of the formats used for conveying the state of the
> objects; typically services use custom XML and/or JSON
> encodings of state information.
>
> The combination of RDF and RESTful APIs is therefore natural, with
> RDF providing a standard way to serialize information about things
> identified by URIs and REST providing a way to obtain and alter
> the state of those things. This approach has been proposed and
> explored for some time, in academia and industry, as shown by the
> items listed in References
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter#ref>. Within W3C, the SPARQL
> Working Group developed a RESTful protocol
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/> for accessing
> data in SPARQL data stores and discussed its wider applicability.
> The participants in the Linked Enterprise Data Patterns Workshop
> <http://www.w3.org/2011/09/LinkedData/Report> expressed general
> support for the creation of a Working Group to define a way to use
> RDF with RESTful APIs in support of application integration.
>
> The basic technique here is to expose application data objects
> ("resources") on the Web, allowing authorized clients to see and
> modify object state using HTTP operations (GET, PUT, etc) with an
> RDF data format. This RESTful approach leverages existing Web
> technology, including caching, linking, and indexing, and the use
> of RDF facilitates integration of data across systems and
> applications. This approach dovetails with SPARQL and is
> positioned for developers who want more direct access to the
> application data.
>
> The Linked Data Platform is envisioned as an enterprise-ready
> collection of standard techniques and services based on using
> RESTful APIs and the W3C Semantic Web stack. Simple LDP
> applications can be developed and deployed using only RDF and
> conventional HTTP infrastructure. More extensive LDP applications
> can be built using other elements of the stack, including RDFS
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/>, SPARQL
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/>, OWL
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/>, RIF
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-overview/>, and the PROV
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-primer/> provenance vocabulary.
> Although expertise in these specialized elements may be helpful,
> it is not necessary for participation in this group and should not
> be required for using the Linked Data Platform.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter
>
>
> A few more notes:
>
> Mission
> =======
>
> The *mission* of the Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp> is to produce a W3C Recommendation for
> HTTP-based (RESTful) application integration patterns using read/write
> Linked Data.
>
> More reading
> ===========
>
> http://dret.typepad.com/dretblog/2012/05/linked-data-and-rest-a-match-made-in-w3c.html
>
>
> Seems like there's an overlap between this WG and our efforts in the
> RWW CG?
>
No overlap on the Web of Linked Data, its all Data and its all Linked ! :-)
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder& CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 14:17:37 UTC