- From: SWC - Jürgen Jakobitsch <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:39:08 +0200
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <1342550348.5784.21.camel@linux-1rgw.site>
i will :) am in transition between mail clients.. but some sort of filter in zimbra removed mails, so i couldn't answer from evolution... reading your post, i will move again to virtuoso sometime soon :) wkr turnguard On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 14:31 -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 7/17/12 2:20 PM, Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote: > > ok thanks henry... > > > > i think i can live with that... > > Waiting for you to send signed emails all the time, including this > mailing list :-) > > Note, the fun has only just begun. S/MIME is step #1. Next step is IMAP4 > & WebID, I already have this working such that I don't care about SPAM. > I advertise my Email everywhere because I just don't worry about Spam. I > can use my iPhone, iPad, Android devices wherever, and I have WebID > based filter rules (just like the ones for resources ACLs) that organize > and tag my mails. I can control all my mail boxes via IMAP4 + WebID > based filtering :-) > > Links: > > 1. https://plus.google.com/s/spam%20webid%20idehen%20imap4%20ods -- old > posts about killing SPAM via WebID . > > Kingsley > > > > wkr turnguard > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> > > To: "Jürgen Jakobitsch" <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at> > > Cc: public-rww@w3.org > > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 8:13:03 PM > > Subject: Re: SignedMail > > > > > > > > > > On 17 Jul 2012, at 19:52, Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote: > > > > > > > > hi and thanks, > > > > this is actually what i was expecting... and hoping to have solved. > > could you also send a screenshot of what happens when you open > > a mail from kingsley. i'm trying to figure out if there's a difference. > > > > > > > > Here it is. > > > > > > > > It seems that his e-mail address is listed in the certificate and that the key usage fields are included. > > Higher up there is the Trust setting that says "Use System Defaults", but even if I set that to trust always, that does not change the e-mail signature verification problem, though the red the turn to green. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wkr turnguard > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Henry Story" < henry.story@bblfish.net > > > To: "j jakobitsch" < j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at > > > Cc: public-rww@w3.org > > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 7:44:01 PM > > Subject: Re: SignedMail > > > > > > This is what I get. > > > > > > There is something wrong with the signature it seems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I later add you by hand to my certificate chain, as your certificate is not signed by a well known CA, so that it would show me that it trusted this came from you. > > > > > > On 17 Jul 2012, at 19:27, SWC - Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote: > > > > > > > > > > the cert for signing this email was created this service [1]. > > are there any mail clients complaining? > > > > evolution (mine) says ok (i have the cert installed though). > > > > any feedback greatly appreciated. > > > > wkr turnguard.com > > > > > > [1] http://id.myopenlink.net/certgen/ > > > > > > > > > > Social Web Architect > > http://bblfish.net/ > > > > -- | Jürgen Jakobitsch, | Software Developer | Semantic Web Company GmbH | Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8 | A - 1070 Wien, Austria | Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22 COMPANY INFORMATION | web : http://www.semantic-web.at/ | foaf : http://company.semantic-web.at/person/juergen_jakobitsch PERSONAL INFORMATION | web : http://www.turnguard.com | foaf : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard | g+ : https://plus.google.com/111233759991616358206/posts | skype : jakobitsch-punkt | xmlns:tg = "http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard#"
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 18:39:41 UTC