- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:32:09 -0400
- To: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4FF87299.5060503@openlinksw.com>
On 7/7/12 8:06 AM, Henry Story wrote: > yes, many services limit the number of calls you can make to their sites. I was starting to architect my code, so that it could easily re-use connections to web sites, and also make it possible to have policies to avoid the platform turning into a tool for denial of service attacks. I think this will be a reason to only allow access to the service to webid authenticated users. Yep! That's the essence of the matter. Basically, Web 2.0 is a realm that's utterly broken for this very reason, technically or commercially. Without verifiable identity and resource access policies you cannot integrate quality of service factors into a business model or infrastructure technology. Simple example, should every SPARQL endpoint give the whole world unfettered access? Should every attempt at a Web-scale service require the data center capacity of Google, Facebook, and friends? FWIW -- Tim O'Reilly once told a W3C audience that (to him) Web 2.0 was the moniker he used to express the construction and sustainability of Google business model, which was fundamentally a function of scale :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 7 July 2012 17:32:32 UTC