- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:09:44 +0200
- To: public-rww@w3.org
Hi all, what do you think about revising the WAC Vocabulary [1]? I guess, the majority of issues are already mentioned at [2]. I would only like to add the following remarks: - add a human-readable representation of this vocabulary (btw, this is still a drawback of the majority of the W3C vocabularies, e.g., the RDF, RDFS and OWL namespace - proper content negotiation please!) - I rendered the WAC Vocabulary with Parrot [3] (see [4]) and discovered that acl:agent property is defined twice - each of them has a different range (I would vote for the foaf:Agent range) - maybe we can already merge the WAC Vocabulary with some terms of the TAC Vocabulary or another triple-based approach (however, I guess, we have to investigate here a bit more time into a deeper comparison). Cheers, Bo [1] http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl [2] http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl/Vocabulary [3] http://ontorule-project.eu/parrot/parrot [4] http://ontorule-project.eu/parrot/parrot?documentUri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fns%2Fauth%2Facl&mimetype=default&profile=technical&language=en&customizeCssUrl=
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 13:10:31 UTC