- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:22:02 -0500
- To: public-rww@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EC2596A.8030803@openlinksw.com>
On 11/14/11 4:33 PM, Serena Villata wrote: > Hi Kingsley, Bob, > sorry for the broken link. > > On 9/21/2011 6:24 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 9/21/11 10:17 AM, Bob Ferris wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> here is another access control vocabulary with a special focus on the >>> Social Web, see: >>> >>> - "Social Semantic Web Access Control" [1] >>> - Social Semantic SPARQL Security for Access Control Vocabulary >>> specification [2] > > Another reference to our work is "An Access Control Model for Linked Data" [3] > > >>> 4. Overall the vocabulary looks a bit over-engineered and could be >>> simplified here and there > > Version 0.2 of S4AC is on-line at http://ns.inria.fr/s4ac/ > In this new version, the vocabulary has been simplified a bit, and a different way of treating the > contextual information has been proposed. > > >>> 1. sioc:item relationships: >>> - I do not really understand the rdfs:subClassOf sioc:Item relations >>> for s4ac:Condition and s4ac:AccessPrivilege > In version 0.2, the class s4ac:Condition has been removed, to simplify the model. > However, s4ac:AccessPrivilege and s4ac:AccessCondition are still subclasses of sioc:Item. > This is mainly to inherit properties, such as sioc:has_creator establishing a link to foaf:OnlineAccount : > this can be useful to consider the relationships among the users as in social networks. Indeed, the name > of the s4ac vocabulary itself is "Social Semantic [...]" thus it is linked to the social dimension modeled by sioc. > >>> 2. I like the idea of exceptions there a bit, see >>> s4ac:hasPositiveException, s4ac:hasNegativeException, ... > > Negative and positive exceptions are then implemented as SPARQL 1.1 FILTER clauses. > Thus, these two properties have been removed in version 0.2 to simplify the model. > An example of this kind of exceptions is > > ASK { FILTER(! (?user=<http://MyExample.net#serena>))} > > >>> [1] http://sdow.semanticweb.org/2011/pub/sdow2011_paper_5.pdf>> [2] http://ns.inria.fr/s4ac>> >>> >> Getting 404 re: http://ns.inria.fr/s4ac/v1/s4ac.rdf :-( > > Further comments are welcome! > > > Cheers, > Serena > > > [3] http://www.springerlink.com/content/5678q85482018453/ > > > Serena, Great stuff! Wondering if you could add some rdfs:isDefinedBy relations to the ontology? See: http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fns.inria.fr%2Fs4ac%2Fv2%23Read&urilookup=1 -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 12:22:30 UTC