- From: Anthony Finkelstein <anthony@systemwire.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:13:47 +0100
- To: public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org
I want to express some reservations as to the general strategy proposed by Benjamin Grosof. I do not believe that the answer to rule language interoperability is to create, as is implied in the strawman, a metalanguage. I think there are simpler and more pragmatic ways forward that have to do with standardising the ways in which rules are referenced, assembled into rule sets and made available to reasoning engines. These should be our first point of attack if we are genuinely concerned with interoperability. Almost inevitably, given the demanding technical issues, a logical metalanguage risks either academic abstraction or excluding major parts of the picture. In any event I am going to put a strong plea, as I did at the workshop to ensure that the scope of the initiative includes the handling of constraints an important sub class of rules. Anthony -- _________________________________________________________________________ Anthony Finkelstein Systemwire Director of Strategy TEL: +44 (0)20 7679 7293 (Direct Dial) MOB: +44 (0)7771 813981 EMAIL: anthony@systemwire.com WEB: http://www.systemwire.com _________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2005 18:13:59 UTC