- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:18:15 -0400 (EDT)
- To: public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org
> Here's a sort of story we've written to explain and motivate > log:notIncludes, aka Scoped Negation As Failure[1]. > > [[ > Because a formula is a finite size, > [...] > ]] > -- section "Implementing defaults and log:notIncludes" > of part "Reaching out onto the Web" > of the Semantic Web Tutorial Using N3 > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/Reach#Implementi This isn't really the case in examples like: [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ To do some inference within another set of rules, a useful relationship is that between a formula, and the result of thinking about it - running any rules in the formula on all the data, recursively just like cwm's --think command line option. This relationship is log:conclusion. To make the initial formula, you can use log:conjunction to merge a list of formulae. { ( <input.data>.log:semantics <axioms.n3>.log:semantics <system-rules.n3>.log:semantics ) log:conjunction :f. :f log:conclusion :g. :g log:notIncludes { :request a :ValidRequest } } => { :request a InvalidRequest }. This means: if what you get by taking the input data, the axioms and the system rules together and thinking about it doesn't tell you that the request is valid, then it is invalid. -- section "Thinking inside thinking with log:conclusion" of part "Reaching out onto the Web" of the Semantic Web Tutorial Using N3 http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/Reach ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] Of course, it may be that cwm is so incomplete that a finite set of premises always has a finite set of conclusions, but this is not true in many formalisms, including the formalism (forward-chaining rules with existentials in the consequent, as seen in http://www.w3.org/2003/Talks/0520-www-tf1-b3-rules/slide15-0.html) that appears to underly cwm. [...] > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2005 21:18:20 UTC