Re: A Rule Interchange Format VS a Rule Language for Interoperability and other issues

ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote:
> You wrote:
> ...
> 
>>Now that we are all convinced that the RLI way is the practical way to 
>>go first (you are convinced, aren't you? :-) the nature of the issues 
>>changes slightly:
> 
> Didn't you actually mean, "...convinced that the RIF way is the practical 
> way to go first..."?

Arghhh! Yes, that is what I meant!

The Rule Interchange Format way is the way to go first, that is what I 
believe (unless somebody can convince me to the contrary)! How could I 
possibly write otherwise?

Christian

Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 11:00:54 UTC